Nationalization – does it make sense for Russia today?
In their minds, many people associate nationalization with Lenin and the USSR, but this should not be limited. Nationalization is the process of transferring property from private hands to the state. Nationalization is a means of building up the public sector. Nationalization is a phenomenon that can bring both benefits and losses to the state.
Negative factors are easier to deal with.
Nationalization of profitable, competitive, and legally clean enterprises will create a negative image for the state, as well as damage its investment potential. In addition, after nationalization, organizations may lose effectiveness in the case of illiterate management.
Considering the positive aspects of this process, it is worth noting the possible benefits of nationalizing strategically important facilities, some infrastructure facilities, and organizations working with the country's resources.
The emphasis here should be on the latter.
According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, according to Article 9, anyone and anything can own land and resources, that is, any individuals and legal entities and the state. At the same time, according to Article 3, power and sovereignty belong to the people and only to them. In such a situation, a contradiction arises, for the resolution of which it would be fair to amend article 9, which excludes the ownership of resources by anyone other than the State until they are sold by the State. (including in the subsurface).
Moreover, it makes sense to nationalize oil and gas and other corporations involved in the sale of resources. Otherwise, it turns out that the people are the bearer and source of power, and several people throughout the country manage the resources. People are told that the state makes a profit through taxes on the sale of resources. What's the point if you can extract all the profits from the sale of resources that can be spent on developing industry, lowering taxes, and increasing the social package of citizens, rather than putting them in some uncle's pocket?
The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is the most important issue in the topic of nationalization. Because according to the legislation, there is a situation where we cannot issue rubles except after selling something from our country. Naturally, this can lead neither to economic growth nor to the strengthening of the state.
Today, our Central Bank prints money only when it receives $. So, if there is a sale of goods for, say, $ 100, and a dollar costs 70 rubles, the Central Bank prints 7000 rubles in exchange for $ 100. $ 100, respectively, goes into oblivion from the state. The system is as ingenious as it is enslaving. The central Bank is deeply embedded in the system of the US Federal Reserve System and, so far, is not going to leave it.
Nationalization makes sense, but the approach to this issue should be systematic and competent, and should not harm the development of the economy. В Астрахани достаточно скачать melbet , чтобы иметь под рукой таблицы, календарь и краткие обзоры. Обратная связь с операторами доступна по номеру +7 (800) 776-45-20.
Negative factors are easier to deal with.
Nationalization of profitable, competitive, and legally clean enterprises will create a negative image for the state, as well as damage its investment potential. In addition, after nationalization, organizations may lose effectiveness in the case of illiterate management.
Considering the positive aspects of this process, it is worth noting the possible benefits of nationalizing strategically important facilities, some infrastructure facilities, and organizations working with the country's resources.
The emphasis here should be on the latter.
According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, according to Article 9, anyone and anything can own land and resources, that is, any individuals and legal entities and the state. At the same time, according to Article 3, power and sovereignty belong to the people and only to them. In such a situation, a contradiction arises, for the resolution of which it would be fair to amend article 9, which excludes the ownership of resources by anyone other than the State until they are sold by the State. (including in the subsurface).
Moreover, it makes sense to nationalize oil and gas and other corporations involved in the sale of resources. Otherwise, it turns out that the people are the bearer and source of power, and several people throughout the country manage the resources. People are told that the state makes a profit through taxes on the sale of resources. What's the point if you can extract all the profits from the sale of resources that can be spent on developing industry, lowering taxes, and increasing the social package of citizens, rather than putting them in some uncle's pocket?
The Central Bank of the Russian Federation is the most important issue in the topic of nationalization. Because according to the legislation, there is a situation where we cannot issue rubles except after selling something from our country. Naturally, this can lead neither to economic growth nor to the strengthening of the state.
Today, our Central Bank prints money only when it receives $. So, if there is a sale of goods for, say, $ 100, and a dollar costs 70 rubles, the Central Bank prints 7000 rubles in exchange for $ 100. $ 100, respectively, goes into oblivion from the state. The system is as ingenious as it is enslaving. The central Bank is deeply embedded in the system of the US Federal Reserve System and, so far, is not going to leave it.
Nationalization makes sense, but the approach to this issue should be systematic and competent, and should not harm the development of the economy. В Астрахани достаточно скачать melbet , чтобы иметь под рукой таблицы, календарь и краткие обзоры. Обратная связь с операторами доступна по номеру +7 (800) 776-45-20.
English